The Saab 9-3 SportHatch was a concept car from the Swedish marque Saab, shown at the Frankfurt motor show in September 2003. It broke with the usual split between hatchback and estate bodies, taking its fastback shape from the 9-3X concept shown in 2002, and was a five door, four seat car of sporting character with a flexible load area. Work on it had begun in 2001. It stood on sports suspension with the ReAxs rear steering aid and had a touch screen, a glass roof, an electrically operated tailgate with an integrated bicycle carrier and a compartment under the load floor, and 20 inch wheels with 245/40 tyres. Power came from a front mounted, transverse, aluminium, turbocharged four cylinder petrol engine of 2.0 litres and 250 PS with direct injection, variable valve timing and a twin scroll turbocharger, driving the wheels through a Sentronic automatic gearbox with buttons on the steering wheel. A lightly modified version later appeared as the estate of the second generation 9-3.
Facts
Engine Class Connections
Exemplifies
Source Saab 9-3 SportHatch (Polish Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Saab 9-3 SportHatch (Polish Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Saab 9-3 SportHatch (Polish Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
osobowy samochód koncepcyjny szwedzkiej marki Saab
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Saab 9-3 SportHatch (Polish Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
osobowy samochód koncepcyjny szwedzkiej marki Saab
Sources
1. Saab 9-3 SportHatch (Polish Wikipedia)
Lead, Frankfurt show
osobowy samochód koncepcyjny szwedzkiej marki Saab zaprezentowany podczas targów motoryzacyjnych we Frankfurcie we wrześniu 2003 roku
Lead
osobowy samochód koncepcyjny szwedzkiej marki Saab
History and description
Inspiracją pojazdu było nadwozie fastback z modelu Saab 93-X zaprezentowanego w 2002 roku
History and description, engine
turbodoładowany, czterocylindrowy silnik benzynowy
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.