Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Piaggio P.32

Military Aircraft

The Piaggio P.32 was an Italian twin-engine medium bomber of the late 1930s, designed by Giovanni Pegna for the Regia Aeronautica after a contest announced in 1934. It had a wooden structure, a glazed nose, twin tail fins and a banana-shaped fuselage, and used very small wings for its size, fitted with leading edge slats and double flaps to cope with the high wing loading. The prototype flew in 1936 and led to orders for the P.32 I with Isotta Fraschini V-12 engines and the P.32 II with Piaggio radials. Both proved underpowered, with a top speed near 386 km/h, and could not fly on one engine. They went to the XXXVII Gruppo in 1937 and were withdrawn to training in April 1938; the P.32 Bis redesign was cancelled after a fatal crash.

Facts
Year
1936 1
Engine Class
Piston 1
Status
Retired from service 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Piaggio P.32 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Piaggio P.32 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Piaggio P.32 (Wikipedia)Lead, maker
Quote, Lead, maker
produced by Piaggio

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Piaggio P.32 (Wikipedia)Lead, origin
Quote, Lead, origin
was an Italian medium bomber of the late 1930s
Sources
1. Piaggio P.32 (Wikipedia)
  • Development
    The prototype first flew in 1936
  • Lead, type
    was an Italian medium bomber of the late 1930s
  • Specifications, powerplant
    V-12 liquid-cooled piston engines
  • Development, withdrawal
    were taken out of service in April 1938
  • Lead, maker
    produced by Piaggio
  • Lead, origin
    was an Italian medium bomber of the late 1930s
  • Exemplifies: Aviation, Lead, mode
    was an Italian medium bomber of the late 1930s
  • In Group: Bombers, Lead, group
    was an Italian medium bomber of the late 1930s
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.