Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Piaggio P.2

Military Aircraft

The Piaggio P.2 was an Italian single-seat fighter prototype built by Piaggio in 1923 around the smallest airframe that could carry a 224 kW Hispano-Suiza HS 42 eight-cylinder water-cooled engine. Giovanni Pegna designed it at the Pegna-Bonmartini workshops in Genoa, and Piaggio finished it after buying the firm that year. It was a very advanced low-wing cantilever monoplane for its time, with a monocoque or semi-monocoque wooden fuselage with plywood skin, fixed landing gear, two radiators and two synchronised machine guns. Two were built and entered in the 1923 Italian fighter contest, but the Air Ministry distrusted monoplanes and the performance fell short of Pegna's predictions, so no production followed. The Regia Aeronautica bought one for evaluation in March 1924.

Facts
Year
1923 1
Engine Class
Piston 1
Status
Prototype 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Piaggio P.2 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Piaggio P.2 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Piaggio P.2 (Wikipedia)Lead, maker
Quote, Lead, maker
built by Piaggio

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Piaggio P.2 (Wikipedia)Lead, origin
Quote, Lead, origin
was an Italian fighter prototype
Sources
1. Piaggio P.2 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    built by Piaggio in 1923
  • Lead, type
    was an Italian fighter prototype
  • Specifications, powerplant
    eight-cylinder water-cooled piston
  • Lead, status
    an Italian fighter prototype of advanced design
  • Lead, maker
    built by Piaggio
  • Lead, origin
    was an Italian fighter prototype
  • Exemplifies: Aviation, Lead, mode
    was an Italian fighter prototype
  • In Group: Propeller-Driven Fighters, Lead, group
    was an Italian fighter prototype
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.