Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Lamborghini Marco Polo

Automobiles

The Lamborghini Marco Polo, also called the Italdesign Marco Polo, was a styling exercise by Italdesign Giugiaro, introduced at the 1982 Bologna Motor Show. It was inspired by the Lancia Medusa concept and had first been drawn for a DeLorean DMC-24 sedan, but DMC ran out of money and Italdesign recycled the design as a concept for Lamborghini. It is not a running prototype but a painted plastic model for aerodynamic research, with a drag coefficient of 0.24 against the Medusa's 0.26. A four-seater with two gull-wing doors like those of the Marzal, it was drawn for quietness and efficiency rather than aggression, and the badge on the nose was only a homage to the brand.

Facts
Year
1982 1
Status
One-off concept 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Source Lamborghini Marco Polo (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Lamborghini Marco Polo (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Lamborghini Marco Polo (Wikipedia)Lead, designer
Quote, Lead, designer
was a styling exercise by Italdesign Giugiaro
Sources
1. Lamborghini Marco Polo (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    Introduced in 1982 at the Bologna Motor Show, the Marco Polo was inspired by the Lancia Medusa concept car designed by Italdesign two years prior.
  • Lead, status
    The Marco Polo is not a running prototype, rather the design is only a painted plastic model for aerodynamic research.
  • Lead, designer
    was a styling exercise by Italdesign Giugiaro
  • In Group: Sports And Performance Cars Since 1980, Lead, vehicle type
    The Lamborghini Marco Polo, or Italdesign Marco Polo, was a styling exercise by Italdesign Giugiaro.
  • Exemplifies: Automobile Transport, Lead, mode
    The Lamborghini Marco Polo, or Italdesign Marco Polo, was a styling exercise by Italdesign Giugiaro.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.