Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Bristol Type 172

Military Aircraft

The Bristol Type 172 was a proposed long range, four engined bomber that the Bristol Aeroplane Company began work on in late 1946, when the Air Ministry was interested in high speed strategic bombers using turbojet propulsion and swept wings. It was a high wing monoplane with 45 degrees of sweepback, and the Air Ministry issued Specification E.8/47 to the firm on 23 July 1947. A half scale single engine model, the Type 174, was planned to test the design, and the wing redesign that followed produced the Type 176, which reached mock up stage in late 1948 before work stopped in favour of the Britannia airliner. No aircraft of the family was ever completed.

Facts
Engine Class
Jet 1
Status
Design only (never built) 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Bristol Type 172 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Bristol Type 172 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Bristol Type 172 (Wikipedia)Lead
Quote, Lead
The Bristol Type 172 was a proposed British long range four-engined bomber project developed by the Bristol Aeroplane Company.

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Bristol Type 172 (Wikipedia)Lead
Quote, Lead
The Bristol Type 172 was a proposed British long range four-engined bomber project developed by the Bristol Aeroplane Company.
Sources
1. Bristol Type 172 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    The Bristol Type 172 was a proposed British long range four-engined bomber project developed by the Bristol Aeroplane Company.
  • Engine
    which made use of relatively new aviation trends, such as turbojet propulsion and a sweptback wing
  • Lead, status
    No aircraft, full-scale or otherwise, were ever completed.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.