Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Bristol F.2 Fighter

Military Aircraft

The Bristol F.2 Fighter is a British two-seat biplane fighter and reconnaissance aircraft built by the Bristol Aeroplane Company, introduced into First World War service in 1917 after early operational use exposed flaws in its initial defensive tactics that were later corrected by flying it more aggressively, like a single-seat fighter, while still making full use of its rear gunner. Built with a forward-firing synchronized machine gun for the pilot and a flexible rear-mounted gun for the observer, the F.2 Fighter, often called simply the Bristol Fighter, combined maneuverability closer to a single-seat fighter than most two-seat aircraft of the period with the tactical flexibility of a rear gunner, making it one of the most effective and long-serving Allied aircraft of the war. The type remained in Royal Air Force service well into the 1930s in various roles, an unusually long career for a First World War-era combat aircraft design.

Facts
Year
1916 1
Significance
Manoeuvrable two-seat fighter that stayed in military service into the early 1930s 1
Manufacturer or Builder
British and Colonial Aeroplane Company 1
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Sources
1. Bristol F.2 Fighter - Wikipedia
  • Infobox, manufacturer
    British and Colonial Aeroplane Company
  • Introduction, third paragraph
    its robust design ensured that it remained in military service into the early 1930s
  • Infobox, first_flight field
    9 September 1916
  • In Group: Propeller-Driven Fighters, Lead sentence
    The Bristol F.2 Fighter is a British First World War two-seat biplane fighter and reconnaissance aircraft developed by Frank Barnwell at the British and Colonial Aeroplane Company later known as the Bristol Aeroplane Company.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.