The Bristol Bagshot, also called the Type 95, was a single prototype heavily armed twin-engined fighter built by the Bristol Aeroplane Company to Air Ministry Specification F.4/24, which asked for a three-man fighter able to carry two 37 mm Coventry Ordnance Works guns. Frank Barnwell designed it as a high-wing all-metal monoplane with an unusual triangular-section steel-tube fuselage and two 450 horsepower Bristol Jupiter VI radial engines on the wing. Barnwell had warned the Air Ministry that the equipment demanded would make the aircraft overweight, but the contract was kept. Cyril Uwins first flew it at Filton on 15 July 1927, and trials showed that twisting of the wing caused control reversal in roll. The project was abandoned and the aircraft, serial J7767, was scrapped in 1931.
Facts
Top Speed (km/h) Maximum Mass (kg) Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Bristol Bagshot (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Bristol Bagshot (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Bristol Bagshot (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
built by the Bristol Aeroplane Company and first flown in 1927
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Bristol Bagshot (Wikipedia)Lead, body styleQuote, Lead, body style
prototype heavily armed British fighter
Sources
1. Bristol Bagshot (Wikipedia)
Lead
first flown in 1927
Lead, status
the project was abandoned
Lead, body style
prototype heavily armed British fighter
Specifications
2 × Bristol Jupiter VI radial
Specifications, mass
Empty weight: 5,100 lb (2,313 kg)
Specifications, maximum mass
Gross weight: 8,195 lb (3,717 kg)
Specifications, top speed
Maximum speed: 125 mph (201 km/h, 109 kn)
Lead, manufacturer
built by the Bristol Aeroplane Company and first flown in 1927
View the Source2. Aviastar: Bristol Bagshot
AviastarSpecificationQuote, Specification
Max. speed 201 km/h 125 mph
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.