Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Wolseley 24/80 (Mark I)

Automobiles

The Mark I was externally identical to the British 15/60 and was an upmarket version of the contemporary Austin Freeway, with different front and rear styling to maximise the perceived difference between the two cars. Its engine was a six cylinder form of the 1,622 cubic centimeter B series, known as the Blue Streak, with 2,433 cubic centimeters and 80 horsepower, and the gearbox was a three speed manual adapted from the Nash Metropolitan. Its model years run from 1962 to 1964.

Facts
Year
1962 1
Manufacturer or Builder
BMC Australia 1
Comparison
Body Style
Sedan 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Followed By

Generation Of

Model Years

Of Make

In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Wikipedia: Wolseley 24/80Lead paragraph, manufacturertier 2
Quote, Lead paragraph, manufacturer
produced by British Motor Corporation (Australia) from May 1962 to October 1965
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Wolseley 24/80
Wikipedia
  • Specifications
    Power was by a six-cylinder version of the 1,622 cc (99.0 cu in) B-series engine, known as the "Blue Streak" straight-six engine with a capacity of 2,433 cc (148.5 cu in) and developing 80 bhp (60 kW; 81 PS) at 4,350 rpm.
  • Year: Specifications
    Power was by a six-cylinder version of the 1,622 cc (99.0 cu in) B-series engine, known as the "Blue Streak" straight-six engine with a capacity of 2,433 cc (148.5 cu in) and developing 80 bhp (60 kW; 81 PS) at 4,350 rpm.
  • Lead paragraph, manufacturer
    produced by British Motor Corporation (Australia) from May 1962 to October 1965
  • Specifications, gearbox
    A three-speed manual gearbox was installed, adapted from the Nash Metropolitan, with synchromesh on the upper two ratios and a steering column gear change.
  • Body style, sedan: Specifications
    It was externally identical to the Wolseley 15/60.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.