The Westland Wagtail was a prototype British fighter of the First World War, a small single bay tractor biplane designed at Yeovil in 1917 by a team led by Robert Bruce and Arthur Davenport to meet Royal Air Force Specification IA for a light fighter better than the Sopwith Camel. Like its rivals, the BAT Bantam and the Sopwith Snail, it used the 170 hp ABC Wasp radial engine. It was built of wood and fabric, with a large cut-out in the upper wing centre section to improve the pilot view, and carried two Vickers machine guns over the nose. Six prototypes were ordered in February 1918, though the last two were cancelled, and the first to fly did so in April 1918. Handling was good, but the Wasp proved unreliable and was abandoned in October 1918, so the Wagtail was never adopted; two more were built in 1920 as testbeds for the Armstrong Siddeley Lynx.
Facts
Engine Class Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Of Make
Source Westland Wagtail (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Westland Wagtail (Wikipedia)Development and design, manufacturerQuote, Development and design, manufacturer
The Westland Wagtail was designed by Westland Aircraft of Yeovil in 1917
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Westland Wagtail (Wikipedia)Lead, country of originQuote, Lead, country of origin
The Westland Wagtail was a prototype British fighter aircraft of the First World War.
Sources
1. Westland Wagtail (Wikipedia)
Development and design
the first to fly, serial number C4291, flying in April 1918
Lead
was a prototype British fighter aircraft of the First World War
Development and design, engine class
the 170 hp (127 kW) ABC Wasp radial engine
Development and design, manufacturer
The Westland Wagtail was designed by Westland Aircraft of Yeovil in 1917
Lead, country of origin
The Westland Wagtail was a prototype British fighter aircraft of the First World War.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.