Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Tupolev Tu-95LAL

Military Aircraft

The Tupolev Tu-95LAL, from the Russian for flying atomic laboratory, was a Soviet experimental aircraft that flew from 1961 to 1965, a Tu-95 bomber modified to test whether a nuclear reactor could power an aircraft, comparable to the American Convair NB-36H. Under a 1955 directive the Tupolev and Myasishchev bureaus led research into nuclear aircraft, and Tupolev proposed a quick flying testbed with a small reactor in a Tu-95M. The VVRL-100 reactor sat in the bomb bay under aerodynamic fairings, and over 40 research flights, mostly with the reactor shut down, examined radiation shielding. The reactor never powered the aircraft, and cost and the rise of ballistic missiles curtailed the programme, ending plans for the Tu-119 follow-on.

Facts
Year
1961 1
Engine Class
Turboprop 1
Status
Cancelled 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Tupolev Tu-95LAL (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Tupolev Tu-95LAL (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Tupolev Tu-95LAL (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturer
Quote, Lead, manufacturer
The design bureaus of Andrei Tupolev and Vladimir Myasishchev became the chief design teams

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Tupolev Tu-95LAL (Wikipedia)Lead, body style
Quote, Lead, body style
was a modified Tupolev Tu-95 Soviet bomber aircraft
Sources
1. Tupolev Tu-95LAL (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    which flew from 1961 to 1965
  • Lead, body style
    was a modified Tupolev Tu-95 Soviet bomber aircraft
  • Design and development
    development was curtailed on grounds of cost and environmental concerns
  • Specifications (Tu-95LAL)
    4 × Kuznetsov NK-12M turboprop engines
  • Lead, manufacturer
    The design bureaus of Andrei Tupolev and Vladimir Myasishchev became the chief design teams
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.