Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Supermarine Type 224

Military Aircraft

The Supermarine Type 224 was a British gull-wing monoplane fighter designed by R. J. Mitchell at Supermarine in response to Air Ministry specification F.7/30, which asked for a new fighter to succeed the Gloster Gauntlet. The specification, issued in October 1931, called for an all-metal day and night fighter with four machine guns, a high speed and rate of climb, a landing speed below 60 miles per hour and good cockpit visibility. The Type 224 used a Rolls-Royce Goshawk engine with an experimental evaporative cooling system. It first flew on 19 February 1934, piloted by Mutt Summers. Problems with the cooling system and disappointing performance in trials led the Air Ministry to reject it, and the production contract eventually went to the Gloster Gladiator. It is nevertheless notable because Mitchell learned lessons from it that contributed to the Spitfire.

Facts
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Year
1934 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Supermarine Type 224 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Supermarine Type 224 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Supermarine Type 224 (Wikipedia)Lead
Quote, Lead
The Supermarine Type 224 was a British gull-wing monoplane fighter aircraft designed by R.J. Mitchell at Supermarine

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Supermarine Type 224 (Wikipedia)Lead
Quote, Lead
The Supermarine Type 224 was a British gull-wing monoplane fighter aircraft designed by R.J. Mitchell at Supermarine
Sources
1. Supermarine Type 224 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    The Supermarine Type 224 was a British gull-wing monoplane fighter aircraft designed by R.J. Mitchell at Supermarine
  • Lead, year
    The Type 224 first flew on 19 February 1934
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.