Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Southern Pacific class AC-9

Steam and Early Locomotives

The Southern Pacific class AC-9 was a group of twelve articulated steam locomotives that the railroad bought from Lima in 1939. They were designed to burn low grade bituminous coal mined in New Mexico and used the 2-8-8-4 wheel arrangement nicknamed Yellowstone. Unlike the railroad's cab forward engines they ran with coal tenders, and they were partly streamlined with skyline casings borrowed from Lima's GS series 4-8-4 locomotives, which made them the only articulated steam engines given that treatment. They worked freight and some passenger trains between Tucumcari, El Paso and Tucson until 1953, were converted to oil in 1950, and then moved to the Modoc line. All twelve were scrapped between 1953 and 1956.

Facts
Year
1939 1
Propulsion
Steam 1
Engine Class
Steam 1
Status
Scrapped 1
Units Built
12 1
Comparison
Body Style
Steam Locomotive 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Rail Transport, Modes
Source Southern Pacific class AC-9 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Southern Pacific class AC-9 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Southern Pacific class AC-9 (Wikipedia)Lead, builder
Quote, Lead, builder
The twelve AC-9 class locomotives were purchased from Lima in 1939
Sources
1. Southern Pacific class AC-9 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead, purchase year
    The twelve AC-9 class locomotives were purchased from Lima in 1939
  • Lead, number built
    The twelve AC-9 class locomotives
  • Lead, locomotive type
    The AC-9 was a class of articulated steam locomotive
  • Lead, power type
    The AC-9 was a class of articulated steam locomotive
  • Final paragraph, fate
    All examples were scrapped between 1953 and 1956.
  • Lead, builder
    The twelve AC-9 class locomotives were purchased from Lima in 1939
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.