The Sopwith Two-Seat Scout, also known as the Type 880 and nicknamed the Spinning Jenny for its tendency to enter a spin, was a British anti-Zeppelin biplane designed and built for the Admiralty by Sopwith in the 1910s. It first flew in November 1914 and was developed from the 1914 Circuit of Britain seaplane. The two-bay biplane had equal-span wings with ailerons on all four, a braced tailplane, a single rudder and a tailskid undercarriage. A nose-mounted 100 horsepower Gnome Monosoupape rotary engine drove a two-bladed propeller, and the two crew sat in tandem open cockpits. It could carry small bombs under the fuselage, and the Royal Naval Air Service was its operator, with 24 built.
Facts
Engine Class Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Sopwith Two-Seat Scout (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Sopwith Two-Seat Scout (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Sopwith Two-Seat Scout (Wikipedia)Lead or design, builderQuote, Lead or design, builder
designed and built for the Admiralty by the Sopwith Aviation Company
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Sopwith Two-Seat Scout (Wikipedia)Lead, British aircraftQuote, Lead, British aircraft
was a 1910s British biplane Anti-Zeppelin scout biplane designed and built for the Admiralty by the Sopwith Aviation Company
Sources
1. Sopwith Two-Seat Scout (Wikipedia)
Design and development, first flight
First flown in November 1914
Lead, aircraft kind
was a 1910s British biplane Anti-Zeppelin scout biplane designed and built for the Admiralty by the Sopwith Aviation Company
Design and development, engine
Gnome Monosoupape rotary engine driving a two-bladed propeller
Lead or design, builder
designed and built for the Admiralty by the Sopwith Aviation Company
Lead, British aircraft
was a 1910s British biplane Anti-Zeppelin scout biplane designed and built for the Admiralty by the Sopwith Aviation Company
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.