Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Sopwith Admiralty Type 860

Flying Boats and Seaplanes

The Sopwith Admiralty Type 860 was a British biplane seaplane torpedo bomber designed and built for the Admiralty by the Sopwith Aviation Company in 1914. It first flew in December 1914 as an unswept biplane with strut-braced extensions on the upper wings and ailerons on all four wings. It rode on twin strut-mounted floats under the fuselage with a float under the tail and at each wingtip, and its two tandem open cockpits sat above a single 810 lb torpedo slung beneath the fuselage. Some were powered by a nose-mounted 200 hp fourteen-cylinder engine and others by a 225 hp Sunbeam Mohawk. It was built in two versions, with equal-span wings or a shorter lower wing, both with folding wings, and it stayed in service with the Royal Naval Air Service until at least 1916.

Facts
Year
1914 1
Engine Class
Piston 1
Power (kW)
164 1
Engine
Salmson 2M7 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Sopwith Admiralty Type 860 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Sopwith Admiralty Type 860 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Sopwith Admiralty Type 860 (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturer
Quote, Lead, manufacturer
designed and built for the Admiralty by the Sopwith Aviation Company

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Sopwith Admiralty Type 860 (Wikipedia)Lead
Quote, Lead
was a 1910s British biplane seaplane torpedo bomber
Sources
1. Sopwith Admiralty Type 860 (Wikipedia)
  • Design and development
    First flown in December 1914
  • Lead
    was a 1910s British biplane seaplane torpedo bomber
  • Specifications
    Salmson 2M7 water-cooled piston engine
  • Specifications, power
    220 hp (160 kW)
  • Lead, manufacturer
    designed and built for the Admiralty by the Sopwith Aviation Company
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.