The Savoia-Marchetti SM.105 was a projected four-engine Italian transport aircraft for military and civil use in the years after the Second World War. It began as an improved version of the SM.104, but after the Fairchild XC-120 and Miles M.68 concepts appeared it was redesigned around a detachable cargo section with a capacity of 64 cubic metres. The cockpit sat above the cargo bay, with large doors forward and aft, and the load was meant to be eight horses and four assistants or two cars. A civil version would have carried 40 seats and a bar behind a fully glassed nose. Its most unusual feature was the detachable central fuselage, which left the cockpit in the middle of the wing, much like the later CH-54 Tarhe helicopter. Conditions in 1947 were not favourable to the project, and the estimated figures show a wingspan of 36.3 metres and a top speed of 400 kilometres per hour.
Facts
StatusDesign only (never built) 1 Top Speed (km/h) Connections
Exemplifies
Source Savoia-Marchetti SM.105 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Savoia-Marchetti SM.105 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Savoia-Marchetti SM.105 (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
The Savoia-Marchetti SM.105 was a projected Italian four-engine military and civil transport aircraft of the post-World War II period.
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Savoia-Marchetti SM.105 (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
The Savoia-Marchetti SM.105 was a projected Italian four-engine military and civil transport aircraft of the post-World War II period.
Sources
1. Savoia-Marchetti SM.105 (Wikipedia)
Specifications, powerplant
Powerplant: 4 × radial engines
Specifications, maximum speed
Maximum speed: 400 km/h (250 mph, 220 kn)
Specifications, empty weight
Empty weight: 13,000 kg (28,660 lb)
Lead
The Savoia-Marchetti SM.105 was a projected Italian four-engine military and civil transport aircraft of the post-World War II period.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.