The PTV-N-2 Gorgon IV was a subsonic ramjet-powered missile developed by the Glenn L. Martin Company for the United States Navy under Project Gorgon. Work began in May 1945 on an air-to-surface weapon with a ramjet engine and active radar homing, but the end of the war reduced the need for it and the contract continued in 1946 as a propulsion test vehicle, finally designated PTV-N-2. It had mildly swept wings, spoilerons for roll control, a Marquardt XRJ30 ramjet under the rear fuselage and a parachute for recovery from the ocean. Nineteen were produced, and flight tests from July 1947 included a first high-speed flight at about Mach 0.85, said to be the first ramjet-powered winged aircraft to fly successfully in the United States. The remaining vehicles were later used as KDM-1 Plover target drones, and a recovered example is displayed at the National Air and Space Museum.
Facts
Engine Class Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source PTV-N-2 Gorgon IV (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source PTV-N-2 Gorgon IV (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source PTV-N-2 Gorgon IV (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
developed by the Glenn L. Martin Company for the United States Navy
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source PTV-N-2 Gorgon IV (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
developed by the Glenn L. Martin Company for the United States Navy
Sources
1. PTV-N-2 Gorgon IV (Wikipedia)
Operational history
with flight tests beginning in July 1947
Operational history, body style
the first ramjet-powered winged aircraft to successfully fly in the United States
Design and development
The Marquardt XRJ30 ramjet engine was mounted below the aft fuselage
Operational history, units built
Nineteen PTV-N-2s were produced
Surviving aircraft
it is on display at the Steven F. Udvar-Hazy Center
Lead
developed by the Glenn L. Martin Company for the United States Navy
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.