The Northrop Grumman XRQ-73 SHEPARD, whose name stands for Series Hybrid Electric Propulsion AiRcraft Demonstration, is a tailless flying wing hybrid-electric unmanned aerial vehicle developed by Northrop Grumman for DARPA. It falls in the Group 3 class of unmanned aircraft and weighs about 1,250 pounds, or 570 kilograms. Northrop Grumman Aeronautic Systems is the prime contractor, with Scaled Composites, Cornerstone Research Group, Brayton Energy, PC Krause and Associates and EaglePicher Technologies as suppliers. The XRQ-73 is an evolution of the XRQ-72A Great Horned Owl. Its first flight took place in April 2026 at Edwards Air Force Base, although DARPA did not officially release the precise date.
Facts
Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Northrop Grumman XRQ-73 SHEPARD (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Northrop Grumman XRQ-73 SHEPARD (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Northrop Grumman XRQ-73 SHEPARD (Wikipedia)Lead, makerQuote, Lead, maker
developed by Northrop Grumman.
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Northrop Grumman XRQ-73 SHEPARD (Wikipedia)Lead, first flight siteQuote, Lead, first flight site
The first flight took place in April 2026, from Edwards Air Force Base
Sources
1. Northrop Grumman XRQ-73 SHEPARD (Wikipedia)
Lead, hybrid-electric
is a tailless flying wing hybrid-electric Group 3 unmanned aerial vehicle
Lead, first flight site
The first flight took place in April 2026, from Edwards Air Force Base
Lead, maker
developed by Northrop Grumman.
Exemplifies: Aviation, Lead
is a tailless flying wing hybrid-electric Group 3 unmanned aerial vehicle
View the Source2. Air & Space Forces Magazine: DARPA Announces a New Flying-Wing Reconnaissance X-Plane: XRQ-73
Air & Space Forces MagazineOpening paragraphQuote, Opening paragraph
an autonomous flying wing reconnaissance aircraft prototype
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.