The Morane-Saulnier AC, also known as the Type AC and the MoS 23, was a French single-seat fighter of 1916. It was conceived in mid-1916 and derived from the Type N by way of the unbuilt Type U. Unlike earlier single-seat Morane-Saulnier aircraft it used ailerons for lateral control instead of wing warping, and its rigid wing bracing was a wire-braced truss of steel tubes supporting the wings from below. It appeared in the autumn of that year and proved aerodynamically clean, and thirty were ordered for the Aviation Militaire after initial testing. Although of advanced design and good performance it was judged inferior to the SPAD S.VII and was not adopted in quantity, although two examples were supplied to the Royal Flying Corps for evaluation.
Facts
Engine Class Top Speed (km/h) Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Morane-Saulnier AC (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Morane-Saulnier AC (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Morane-Saulnier AC (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
The Morane-Saulnier AC, also known as Morane-Saulnier Type AC and MoS 23, was a French fighter of the 1910s.
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Morane-Saulnier AC (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
The Morane-Saulnier AC, also known as Morane-Saulnier Type AC and MoS 23, was a French fighter of the 1910s.
Sources
1. Morane-Saulnier AC (Wikipedia)
Development and operational history
The AC's first flight is unrecorded, however it is assumed that it was late summer 1916.
Specifications: Powerplant
Powerplant: 1 × Le Rhône 9J or Le Rhône 9Jb nine-cylinder air-cooled rotary engine , 82 kW (110 hp)
Specifications: Empty weight
Empty weight: 435 kg (957 lb)
Specifications: Maximum speed
Maximum speed: 178 km/h (111 mph, 96 kn)
Lead
The Morane-Saulnier AC, also known as Morane-Saulnier Type AC and MoS 23, was a French fighter of the 1910s.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.