Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Messerschmitt P.1107

Military Aircraft

The Messerschmitt P.1107, also given the proposed RLM designation Me 462, was a jet-powered bomber project developed late in the Second World War. Proposed on 25 January 1945 as the P.1107/I, it drew on experience with the Me 264 bomber, using that aircraft's fuselage with wooden wings, a crew of four in a pressurized cabin, and either two BMW 018 turbojets or four BMW 003D or Heinkel HeS 011 turbojets in wing pods, with a 4,000 kg internal bomb load. The RLM rejected it because it would not have had the speed or altitude to reach the United States safely. A refined all-metal P.1107/II with four HeS 011 engines in the wing roots and a V-tail was in the early stages of construction when the war ended, and a tailless third variant was drawn under the label IX-122.

Facts
Year
1945 1
Engine Class
Turbojet 1
Status
Design only (never built) 1
Maximum Mass (kg)
29,000 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Messerschmitt P.1107 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Messerschmitt P.1107 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Messerschmitt P.1107 (Wikipedia)Lead, maker
Quote, Lead, maker
On January 25, 1945, Messerschmitt proposed the P.1107/I jet-powered bomber.
Sources
1. Messerschmitt P.1107 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    was a jet-powered bomber project
  • Design and development
    On January 25, 1945, Messerschmitt proposed the P.1107/I jet-powered bomber.
  • Lead, status
    was a jet-powered bomber project developed in the final years of the Second World War
  • Design and development, engine class
    was to be powered by two BMW 018 turbojet engines mounted in pods under the wings
  • Specifications (P.1107/I as proposed)
    Max takeoff weight: 29,000 kg (63,916 lb) as bomber
  • Lead, maker
    On January 25, 1945, Messerschmitt proposed the P.1107/I jet-powered bomber.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.