Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

MBDA DefendAir

Military Aircraft

DefendAir is a guided missile that MBDA is developing specifically for counter-drone work, intended to intercept small and medium-sized unmanned aerial systems that are fast and highly manoeuvrable. MBDA says it can engage targets at ranges beyond 5 kilometres, which extends the defended perimeter beyond what gun systems cover, and that several missiles can be launched together against swarms. The missile is stowed maintenance-free in a protective container and provides 360-degree coverage. It is built for low cost and large production quantities and draws on proven technology derived from the Enforcer shoulder-launched missile, which shortens development. MBDA positions it beside Sky Warden, the Mistral family and CAMM as part of its counter-UAS offer and sees potential for it within the European Sky Shield Initiative.

Facts
Comparison
Body Style
Missile 1
Status
Under development 2
Connections

Of Make

Source DEFENDAIR (MBDA)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source DEFENDAIR (MBDA)DefendAir page, introduction
Quote, DefendAir page, introduction
Committed to providing effective force protection, MBDA is developing DEFENDAIR, a specialised guided missile designed specifically for counter-drone operations.
Sources
1. DEFENDAIR (MBDA)
  • DefendAir page, introduction, type of weapon
    a specialised guided missile designed specifically for counter-drone operations
  • DefendAir page, introduction
    Committed to providing effective force protection, MBDA is developing DEFENDAIR, a specialised guided missile designed specifically for counter-drone operations.
View the Source
2. MBDA (Wikipedia)
Programmes under development, products in development, surface-to-air missiles
Quote, Programmes under development, products in development, surface-to-air missiles
DefendAir (VSHORAD)
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.