Aspide 2000 is the upgraded surface-to-air version of the Aspide multi-role missile, which MBDA and its predecessors Selenia and Alenia Aeronautica produced from an Italian design of the 1970s. MBDA describes it as having an enhanced single-stage rocket motor that raises speed, lateral acceleration and effective range by as much as 40 percent over the baseline Aspide, so that it can engage attacking aircraft before they release their stand-off missiles, and as having modern electronics for better guidance in heavy clutter and electronic countermeasures. A system modification kit lets it be used with every system that fires the baseline Aspide, including Albatros, Spada, Skyguard and Amoun, reusing existing logistic support. It is used on export Skyguard and Spada 2000 air-defence systems.
Facts
Engine Class Connections
Derived From
Source Aspide (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Aspide (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Aspide (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
produced by Selenia and its successors, Alenia Aeronautica and MBDA
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Aspide (Wikipedia)Lead, country of originQuote, Lead, country of origin
Aspide, named for the asp, is an Italian medium range air-to-air and surface-to-air missile
Sources
1. ASPIDE 2000 (MBDA)
Aspide 2000 page, introduction
The ASPIDE 2000 missile is the powerful upgraded version of the ASPIDE multi-role missile for use in surface-to-air systems.
Aspide 2000 page, rocket motor
The ASPIDE 2000 is equipped with an enhanced single stage rocket motor
View the SourceAspide (Wikipedia)
Lead
produced by Selenia and its successors, Alenia Aeronautica and MBDA
Lead, country of origin
Aspide, named for the asp, is an Italian medium range air-to-air and surface-to-air missile
Derived From: MBDA Aspide, Variants
Improved surface-to-air version of the Aspide Mk.1 featuring a 40% improvement in range
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.