The Martin B-10 is a bomber designed by the Glenn L. Martin Company that entered service in June 1934 as the first all-metal monoplane bomber regularly used by the United States Army Air Corps. It began as the private venture Model 123, which first flew on 16 February 1932, and its closed cockpits, rotating turret, retractable landing gear, internal bomb bay and full engine cowlings became the standard for bomber design worldwide. Martin won the 1932 Collier Trophy for the XB-10. A total of 348 were built, with the United States and the Netherlands the largest users, and the airframe served as the basis for the B-12, B-13, B-14, A-15 and O-45.
Facts
Engine Class Top Speed (km/h) Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Martin B-10 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Martin B-10 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Martin B-10 (Wikipedia)Lead, body styleQuote, Lead, body style
is a bomber aircraft designed by the Glenn L. Martin Company
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Martin B-10 (Wikipedia)Lead, country of originQuote, Lead, country of origin
the first all-metal monoplane bomber to be regularly used by the United States Army Air Corps
Sources
1. Martin B-10 (Wikipedia)
Lead
Entering service in June 1934
Surviving aircraft
The only surviving complete example is on display at the National Museum of the United States Air Force
Specifications
2 × Wright R-1820-33 Cyclone (F-3) 9-cylinder air-cooled radial piston engines
Lead, body style
is a bomber aircraft designed by the Glenn L. Martin Company
Specifications, top speed
Maximum speed: 213 mph (343 km/h, 185 kn)
Specifications, mass
Empty weight: 9,681 lb (4,391 kg)
Lead, units built
A total of 348 of all versions were built.
Lead, country of origin
the first all-metal monoplane bomber to be regularly used by the United States Army Air Corps
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.