Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Lotus 49

Automobiles

The Lotus 49 was a Formula One racing car designed by Colin Chapman and Maurice Philippe for the 1967 season, after a difficult first year of the three-litre formula with the heavy and unreliable BRM H16 engine. It was the first Formula One car powered by the Ford Cosworth DFV, and it was among the first to use the engine as a stressed member bolted to the monocoque, a layout that virtually all later Formula One cars adopted. Jim Clark won on its debut at Zandvoort in 1967 and took the last win of his career in it in 1968, the year Graham Hill won the drivers' title. The 49B brought aerofoil wings mounted directly to the wheel hubs, which were banned after several breakages. Twelve cars were built, they won twelve races and contributed to two drivers' and constructors' championships before the Lotus 72 replaced them in 1970, and seven of the twelve survive.

Facts
Year
1967 1
Status
Out of production 1
Comparison
Body Style
Racing car 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Source Lotus 49 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Lotus 49 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Lotus 49 (Wikipedia)Livery, Team Lotus entries
Quote, Livery, Team Lotus entries
Team Lotus's 2.5 litre engined 49s
Sources
1. Lotus 49 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead, debut
    Jim Clark won on the car's debut, in 1967
  • Lead, kind of vehicle
    The Lotus 49 was a Formula One racing car
  • Racing history, replacement
    it was replaced by the Lotus 72 during 1970
  • Livery, Team Lotus entries
    Team Lotus's 2.5 litre engined 49s
  • Of Make: Lotus, Lead, maker
    The Lotus 49 was a Formula One racing car designed by Colin Chapman and Maurice Philippe for the 1967 F1 season.
View the Source
Cosworth DFV (Wikipedia)
Has Part: Cosworth DFV, Formula One, 1967 Dutch Grand Prix
Quote, Has Part: Cosworth DFV, Formula One, 1967 Dutch Grand Prix
put his DFV-powered Lotus 49 on pole position by half a second
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.