Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Lockheed X-7

Military Aircraft

The Lockheed X-7, nicknamed the Flying Stove Pipe, was an American unmanned test bed of the 1950s for ramjet engines and missile guidance technology. Development began in December 1946 after the United States Air Force asked for an unmanned ramjet test vehicle able to reach at least Mach 3. Lockheed gave it the in-house designation L-171, and the Air Force first called it PTV-A-1 before it became the X-7 in 1951. The vehicle was dropped from a B-29 or B-50 carrier aircraft, accelerated on a rocket booster and then ran on its ramjet, and it was recovered by a multi-stage parachute that left a nose rod to plant it upright in the ground. Steel and nickel alloy construction coped with air friction heating before titanium was widely used. A total of 130 flights were flown from April 1951 to July 1960, and the X-7 became the basis of the later AQM-60 Kingfisher target drone.

Facts
Year
1951 1
Engine Class
Rocket 1
Engine Class
Ramjet 1
Status
Cancelled 1
Top Speed (km/h)
4710 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Lockheed X-7 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Lockheed X-7 (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Lockheed X-7 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    is an American unmanned test bed of the 1950s for ramjet engines and missile guidance technology
  • Specifications of X-7A-1
    Sustainer: Ramjet
  • Specifications of X-7A-1, engine class
    Booster: Alleghany Ballistics Lab. X202-C3 solid- fuel rocket
  • Purpose
    the X-7 project was terminated in the mid-1960s
  • Early development
    A total of 130 X-7 flights were conducted from April 1951 to July 1960.
  • Specifications of X-7A-1, top speed
    Mach 4.31 (4,710 km/h; 2,927 mph)
  • Early development, manufacturer
    was given in the Lockheed in-house designation L-171
  • Lead, country of origin
    is an American unmanned test bed of the 1950s
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.