Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Learjet 85

General Aviation and Light Aircraft

The Learjet 85 was a Learjet development programme by Bombardier Aerospace, launched on 30 October 2007 with a mockup shown at the NBAA show in Orlando in October 2008. It was to fit between the midsize and super-midsize segments, was designed for FAR-25 certification, and was the first Bombardier Aerospace business jet with a composite structure, using wing technology similar to the CSeries. Intended performance was a high-speed cruise of Mach 0.82 and a transcontinental range of up to 3,000 nautical miles, from two Pratt and Whitney PW307B turbofans. Nearly 60 orders were reported at US$17.2 million. The first test flight was on 9 April 2014, the programme was suspended in January 2015 with 1,000 jobs cut, and it was cancelled in October 2015 so the company could concentrate on the CSeries and the Global 7000/8000.

Facts
Year
2014 1
Engine Class
Jet 1
Status
Cancelled 1
Comparison
Body Style
Light Business Jet 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Learjet 85 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Learjet 85 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Learjet 85 (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturer
Quote, Lead, manufacturer
The Learjet 85 was a Learjet development program by aircraft manufacturer Bombardier Aerospace.
Sources
1. Learjet 85 (Wikipedia)
  • Development, first flight or certification
    The first test flight was on 9 April 2014.
  • Lead, production status
    The program was cancelled in 2015.
  • Lead, type of aircraft
    it was the first Bombardier Aerospace business jet to feature a composite structure
  • Design, engines
    Pratt & Whitney PW307B turbofans
  • Lead, manufacturer
    The Learjet 85 was a Learjet development program by aircraft manufacturer Bombardier Aerospace.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.