The Junkers Ju 322 Mammut (German for mammoth) was a heavy transport glider for the Luftwaffe, shaped like a giant flying wing and designed in late 1940 as the Junkers EF 094 to do the same job as the Messerschmitt Me 321 Gigant. Because it had to be built from non-strategic materials it was an all-wooden design, a technology in which Junkers had little experience. It was meant to carry 20,000 kg of cargo, such as a Panzer IV tank or an 88 mm anti-aircraft gun, but a test with a battle tank compacted the cargo floor and the planned payload was cut to 16,000 kg and then to 11,000 kg. The first prototype made its maiden flight in April 1941, towed by a Junkers Ju 90, and proved highly unstable under tow before landing in a field from which tanks needed two weeks to tow it back. The Air Ministry dropped the project in May 1941 as an inherently poor design, and the two prototypes and 98 partly finished gliders were cut up for fuel.
Facts
Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Junkers Ju 322 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Junkers Ju 322 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Junkers Ju 322 (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
The Junkers Ju 322 Mammut (German for mammoth) was a heavy transport military glider, resembling a giant flying wing, proposed for use by the Luftwaffe in World War II
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Junkers Ju 322 (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
The Junkers Ju 322 Mammut (German for mammoth) was a heavy transport military glider, resembling a giant flying wing, proposed for use by the Luftwaffe in World War II
Sources
1. Junkers Ju 322 (Wikipedia)
Lead
The Junkers Ju 322 Mammut (German for mammoth) was a heavy transport military glider, resembling a giant flying wing, proposed for use by the Luftwaffe in World War II
History
The Ju 322 V1 made its maiden flight in April 1941
History, status
the RLM ordered the Ju 322 project dropped in May 1941, considering it an inherently poor design
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.