Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Fokker PW-5

Military Aircraft

The Fokker PW-5, which Fokker itself designated the F VI, was a Dutch fighter of the 1920s, a parasol monoplane of which twelve were built for the US Army Air Service and used as advanced trainers. In 1921 the Air Service evaluated the Fokker D.VIII parasol monoplane and the D.VII biplane, both fighters handed over to it after the Armistice, and then ordered two parasol monoplane fighters based on the D.VIII but powered by an American-built Hispano-Suiza V-8 engine. They had plywood-covered wooden cantilever wings like the D.VIII and D.X, a typical Fokker welded steel-tube fuselage with the forward part protected by armour plates, a fixed tailskid undercarriage and no fixed fin, only a balanced rudder. The two evaluation examples were delivered in 1921, one of them crashing on 13 March 1922 when its wing failed from flutter, and an order for ten more followed and was delivered, the aircraft serving as advanced trainers with the 1st Pursuit Group.

Facts
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Units Built
12 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Fokker PW-5 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Fokker PW-5 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Fokker PW-5 (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturer
Quote, Lead, manufacturer
The Fokker PW-5 (designated Fokker F VI by Fokker) was a Dutch fighter aircraft of the 1920s.

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Fokker PW-5 (Wikipedia)Lead
Quote, Lead
was a Dutch fighter aircraft of the 1920s
Sources
1. Fokker PW-5 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    was a Dutch fighter aircraft of the 1920s
  • Lead, units built
    of which twelve were built for the US Army Air Service
  • Lead, manufacturer
    The Fokker PW-5 (designated Fokker F VI by Fokker) was a Dutch fighter aircraft of the 1920s.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.