The Focke-Wulf Fw 57 was a prototype German heavy fighter and fighter-bomber. In 1934 the Reich Air Ministry set a requirement for a Kampfzerstorer, a battle destroyer meaning a tactical multi-role fighter and bomber, and Focke-Wulf submitted the Fw 57 against the Messerschmitt Bf 110 and the Henschel Hs 124. It was a twin-engine all-metal monoplane of conventional layout with a single fin, a long canopy over a pilot and navigator seated in tandem, and a gunner turret at the rear. The Fw 57 was larger and heavier than its rivals and handled worse. Three prototypes were completed in 1936, but the aircraft was badly overweight, the turret-armed concept was dropped in favour of the simpler Bf 110, and all further work on the Fw 57 was abandoned.
Facts
Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Focke-Wulf Fw 57 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Focke-Wulf Fw 57 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Focke-Wulf Fw 57 (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
Focke-Wulf submitted the Fw 57
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Focke-Wulf Fw 57 (Wikipedia)Lead, originQuote, Lead, origin
was a prototype German heavy fighter and fighter-bomber
Sources
1. Focke-Wulf Fw 57 (Wikipedia)
Design and development, first flight
Prototypes were built in 1936 but never entered production.
Lead, type
was a prototype German heavy fighter and fighter-bomber
Production end
All further research into the Fw 57 was abandoned shortly thereafter.
Production total
Three Fw 57 prototypes (V1-V3) were completed during 1936.
Lead, manufacturer
Focke-Wulf submitted the Fw 57
Lead, origin
was a prototype German heavy fighter and fighter-bomber
In Group: Propeller-Driven Fighters, Lead, role
was a prototype German heavy fighter and fighter-bomber
Exemplifies: Aviation, Lead, role
was a prototype German heavy fighter and fighter-bomber
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.