The Douglas BTD Destroyer was an American dive and torpedo bomber developed for the United States Navy during World War II. It grew from the XSB2D-1, ordered on 20 June 1941 as two prototypes of a two-seat dive bomber to replace both the SBD Dauntless and the SB2C Helldiver, designed by a team led by Ed Heinemann as a large single-engined mid-wing aircraft. The prototype first flew on 8 April 1943, faster than the Dauntless and able to carry more bombs but heavier and more complex, and Douglas reworked it into a single-seat torpedo and dive bomber without turrets. The first production BTD-1 aircraft were completed in June 1944, but only 28 had been delivered by the time Japan surrendered in August 1945 and production was cancelled; none saw combat.
Facts
Maximum Mass (kg) Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Douglas BTD Destroyer (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Douglas BTD Destroyer (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Douglas BTD Destroyer (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
the United States Navy placed an order with the Douglas Aircraft Company for two prototypes
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Douglas BTD Destroyer (Wikipedia)Lead, country of originQuote, Lead, country of origin
The Douglas BTD Destroyer is an American dive/torpedo bomber developed for the United States Navy
Sources
1. Douglas BTD Destroyer (Wikipedia)
Design and development
The prototype first flew on 8 April 1943
Lead
American dive/torpedo bomber
Specifications
Empty weight: 12,900 lb (5,851 kg)
Specifications, maximum mass
Max takeoff weight: 19,000 lb (8,618 kg)
Lead, manufacturer
the United States Navy placed an order with the Douglas Aircraft Company for two prototypes
Lead, country of origin
The Douglas BTD Destroyer is an American dive/torpedo bomber developed for the United States Navy
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.