The Dennis Dominator was the first rear-engined double-decker bus chassis from Dennis, launched in 1977 after the company had been absent from bus building since the last Lolines of 1967. It was sold as a bespoke chassis with many options and was seen as a successor of sorts to the Daimler and Leyland Fleetline, differing in carrying its radiator at the front rather than beside the engine. The usual choice was a Gardner 6LXB engine with a Voith DIWA transmission, though Rolls-Royce Eagle, Cummins L10 and DAF engines were also available. South Yorkshire PTE was the largest British customer, taking 318, and Leicester City Transport bought 123 between 1977 and 1989. Production became sporadic after bus deregulation in 1986 and ended with four delivered to London and Country in 1996.
Facts
Connections
Exemplifies
Source Dennis Dominator (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Dennis Dominator (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Dennis Dominator (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
Dennis's first rear-engined double-decker bus chassis
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Dennis Specialist Vehicles (Wikipedia)Lead, location of the makerQuote, Lead, location of the maker
Dennis Specialist Vehicles was an English manufacturer of commercial vehicles based in Guildford
Sources
1. Dennis Dominator (Wikipedia)
Lead, first year
It was launched in 1977.
Lead, production period
a final four built in 1996
Lead, vehicle kind
double-decker bus chassis
Lead, manufacturer
Dennis's first rear-engined double-decker bus chassis
Of Make: Dennis, Lead, maker
Dennis's first rear-engined double-decker bus chassis
In Group: Double-Decker Buses, Lead, kind of vehicle
The Dennis Dominator was Dennis's first rear-engined double-decker bus chassis.
Exemplifies: Bus Transport, Lead, mode
The Dennis Dominator was Dennis's first rear-engined double-decker bus chassis.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.