The Chrysler Aviat was a concept car shown by Chrysler at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit in 1994. The idea was to build another sporty car on the platform of the two- and four-door Dodge and Plymouth Neon. The two-seat Aviat put great weight on aerodynamics, with covered rear wheel arches and an air passage between them and the passenger cell, and its other special feature was scissor doors. It was driven by a 2.0 litre 16-valve DOHC inline four-cylinder engine rated at 147 PS (108 kilowatts) that sent power to the front wheels, with the cooling system installed behind the rear wheel arches. It never went into series production.
Facts
Engine Class Connections
Exemplifies
Source Chrysler Aviat (Wikipedia, German)
Of Make
Source Chrysler Aviat (Wikipedia, German)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Chrysler Aviat (Wikipedia, German)Lead, makerQuote, Lead, maker
des US-amerikanischen Automobilherstellers Chrysler
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Chrysler Aviat (Wikipedia, German)Lead, place of manufactureQuote, Lead, place of manufacture
auf der North American International Auto Show in Detroit
Sources
1. Chrysler Aviat (Wikipedia, German)
Lead, model year
das 1994 auf der North American International Auto Show in Detroit vorgestellt wurde
Production history
Zu einer Serienproduktion des Aviat kam es nicht.
Engine description
Reihenvierzylindermotor
Engine description, power
147 PS (108 kW)
Lead, maker
des US-amerikanischen Automobilherstellers Chrysler
Lead, place of manufacture
auf der North American International Auto Show in Detroit
Of Make: Chrysler, Lead, make
des US-amerikanischen Automobilherstellers Chrysler
In Group: Sports And Performance Cars Since 1980, Lead, class
ein weiteres sportliches Fahrzeug zu bauen
Exemplifies: Automobile Transport, Lead, passenger car
ein weiteres sportliches Fahrzeug zu bauen
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.