The CR200J is a Chinese Fuxing trainset made up of a power car and unpowered passenger cars, operated by China Railway. It is the slowest member of the Fuxing series and the only one designed for existing railways at under 200 km/h rather than for newer high-speed lines. It was jointly designed and produced by six companies under CRRC. Development began on 28 August 2015, prototypes were testing by April 2017, and the train was formally put into service in January 2019 after China Railway announced new service lines. All sets are painted green, and the interior follows the design of the CR400 Fuxing trains with individual power outlets, Wi-Fi and larger legroom. A plateau variant, the CR200JS-G, is used on the Sichuan to Tibet railway. The type has drawn criticism over fares, reliability and appearance, and eleven six-car sets are expected on Malaysia's East Coast Rail Link in 2027.
Facts
Connections
Exemplifies
Source China Railway CR200J (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source China Railway CR200J (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source China Railway CR200J (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
The train was jointly designed and produced by six companies under CRRC.
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source China Railway CR200J (Wikipedia)Lead, country of originQuote, Lead, country of origin
is a Chinese trainset consisting of a power car paired with unpowered passenger cars
Sources
1. China Railway CR200J (Wikipedia)
Design and development, service
On 5 January 2019, China Railway announced several new service lines, and the CR200J was formally put into service.
Lead
The train was jointly designed and produced by six companies under CRRC.
Lead, country of origin
is a Chinese trainset consisting of a power car paired with unpowered passenger cars
In Group: Multiple Unit Trains, Controversy
The Fuxing CR200J EMU has been controversial since it was put into operation
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.