Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

CASA C-102

Military Aircraft

The CASA C-102 was a Spanish military trainer aircraft that was designed in the late 1970s but never built. The project began in 1977 when the Spanish Air Force asked CASA for a trainer. CASA answered with a conventional all-metal monoplane with a T-tail, a fixed tricycle undercarriage and side-by-side seating for the pilot and the instructor. When the Air Force opened a formal tender a year later for its Future Selective Light Aircraft, CASA offered a refined version called the C-102S, and it also sketched a four-seat utility variant, the C-102SE. Interest then faded and no order was placed, so the design stayed on paper. The Air Force did not fill the trainer role with a modern type until about a decade later.

Facts
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Status
Design only (never built) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source CASA C-102 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source CASA C-102 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source CASA C-102 (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturer
Quote, Lead, manufacturer
The project was initiated by a 1977 request to CASA by the Ejército del Aire for such an aircraft.

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source CASA C-102 (Wikipedia)Lead, country of origin
Quote, Lead, country of origin
designed in Spain in the late 1970s
Sources
1. CASA C-102 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    The CASA C-102 was a military trainer aircraft designed in Spain in the late 1970s but never actually built.
  • Lead, status
    designed in Spain in the late 1970s but never actually built
  • Lead, manufacturer
    The project was initiated by a 1977 request to CASA by the Ejército del Aire for such an aircraft.
  • Lead, country of origin
    designed in Spain in the late 1970s
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.