Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

CASA C-101 Aviojet

Military Aircraft

The CASA C-101 Aviojet is a low-wing, single-engine jet advanced trainer and light attack aircraft designed and built by the Spanish company Construcciones Aeronáuticas SA (CASA). It was developed to meet a Spanish Air Force requirement of 1975 for a replacement for the ageing Hispano HA-200 and Ha.220 trainers, with technical help from Germany's Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm, whose engineers worked on the rear fuselage and tail, and the American company Northrop, whose team designed the wings and engine inlets. The first of four prototypes flew in June 1977 and the Spanish Air Force introduced the type into service on 17 March 1980. A tandem two-seat cockpit, an unswept wing, a Honeywell TFE731 turbofan and a large internal weapons bay beneath the rear cockpit characterise the design. Chile, Honduras and Jordan bought it for their air forces, and the Spanish Air and Space Force retired the type in June 2025.

Facts
Year
1977 1
Engine Class
Jet 1
Top Speed (km/h)
769 1
Engine
Honeywell TFE731-5-1J turbofan 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source CASA C-101 Aviojet (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source CASA C-101 Aviojet (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. CASA C-101 Aviojet (Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    low-wing single engine jet-powered advanced trainer and light attack aircraft
  • Lead, engine class
    single engine jet-powered advanced trainer
  • Lead, first flight
    In June 1977, the first of four prototypes performed the type's maiden flight.
  • Specifications (C-101CC)
    Powerplant: 1 × Honeywell TFE731-5-1J turbofan engine, 19.13 kN (4,300 lbf) thrust
  • Specifications (C-101CC), top speed
    Maximum speed: 769 km/h (478 mph, 415 kn)
  • Lead, manufacturer
    designed and manufactured by Spanish aircraft company Construcciones Aeronáuticas SA (CASA)
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.