The Bristol Prier monoplane was an early British aircraft produced in a number of single seat and two seat versions. The Prier monoplanes were designed for the Bristol and Colonial Aeroplane Company by Pierre Prier, the former chief pilot of the Bleriot school at Hendon, who joined Bristol in July 1911. They resembled the successful Bleriot XI, with a fabric covered wire braced wooden fuselage and parallel chord wings using wing warping, and were powered by a 50 hp Gnome rotary engine. One was shown at the 1911 Paris Aero Salon, the only British aircraft there. Demonstration flights in Madrid and Germany led Bristol to start a German subsidiary, and the type was used mostly for training and racing.
Facts
Engine Class Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Bristol Prier monoplane (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Bristol Prier monoplane (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Bristol Prier monoplane (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
The Bristol Prier Monoplanes were a series of tractor configuration monoplanes designed for the Bristol and Colonial Aeroplane Company by Pierre Prier
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Bristol Prier monoplane (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
The Bristol Prier monoplane was an early British aircraft produced in a number of single- and two-seat versions.
Sources
1. Bristol Prier monoplane (Wikipedia)
Lead
The Bristol Prier monoplane was an early British aircraft produced in a number of single- and two-seat versions.
Lead and development
for exhibition at the 1911 Paris Aero Salon where it was the only British aircraft on display
Engine
It was powered by a 50 hp (37 kW) Gnome rotary engine.
Lead, manufacturer
The Bristol Prier Monoplanes were a series of tractor configuration monoplanes designed for the Bristol and Colonial Aeroplane Company by Pierre Prier
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.