Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

2025 Range Rover Evoque

Automobiles

The Evoque of 2025 was still the L551, with Land Rover's Velar-derived design language and a PTA-platform structure shared with the Jaguar E-Pace. It was offered with the 15 kWh P300e plug-in hybrid and Ingenium petrol and diesel engines. A China-built long-wheelbase version had been on sale since 2021, and the car was also assembled at Halewood near Liverpool. The sources used here do not record any change dated to the 2025 model year.

Facts
Year
2025 2
Manufacturer or Builder
Land Rover 1
Comparison
Body Style
SUV or Crossover 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Followed By

Model Year Of

Of Make

Preceded By

In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Wikipedia: Land RoverManufacturing, buildertier 2
Quote, Manufacturing, builder
JLR builds Land Rovers in Brazil, China, India, Slovakia, and the United Kingdom.

Built By

Also in Business Atlas: the company or plant that built this subject.

Source Wikipedia: Land RoverManufacturing, buildertier 2
Quote, Manufacturing, builder
JLR builds Land Rovers in Brazil, China, India, Slovakia, and the United Kingdom.
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Range Rover Evoque
Wikipedia
  • Lead paragraph, builder
    developed and produced by Jaguar Land Rover
  • Evoque P300e battery 2025
    The 15 kWh lithium-ion battery pack is claimed to deliver an all-electric range of up to 66 km (41 mi).
  • Evoque China LWB 2025
    A China-exclusive long-wheelbase version was revealed at an event in Shanghai on 15 June 2021.
  • Body style, suv: L551, crossover
    is a subcompact luxury crossover SUV developed and produced by Jaguar Land Rover
View the Source
2. Wikipedia: Land Rover Discovery Sport
WikipediaEvoque PTA 2025, year
Quote, Evoque PTA 2025, year
It is also used by the Jaguar E-Pace and L551 version of Range Rover Evoque.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.