Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Gloster Gamecock

Military Aircraft

The Gloster Gamecock was a single-seat biplane fighter developed from the Grebe to Air Ministry Specification 37/23, with a Bristol Jupiter radial engine replacing the unreliable Armstrong Siddeley Jaguar and machine guns moved inside the fuselage. The prototype first flew on 22 February 1925 and 30 production aircraft were ordered that September. The Gamecock entered service in 1926, was loved for its agility and air show aerobatics, but crashed often; 22 of the 90 RAF aircraft were lost in landing or spin accidents. Finland built the improved Mark II under licence as the Kukko, flew it in the Winter War and kept the last one until 1944.

Facts
Year
1925 1
Engine Class
Piston 1
Status
Out of production 1
Top Speed (km/h)
249 1
Mass (kg)
875.4 1
Comparison
Body Style
Aircraft (no road body style) 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Gloster Gamecock (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Gloster Gamecock (Wikipedia)
Sources
1. Gloster Gamecock (Wikipedia)
  • Lead, first flight of the prototype
    The prototype Gamecock performed its maiden flight on 22 February 1925.
  • Lead, aircraft
    The Gloster Gamecock was a biplane fighter
  • Specifications, powerplant
    Powerplant: 1 × Bristol Jupiter VI nine-cylinder air-cooled radial piston engine, 425 hp (317 kW)
  • Operational history, last Finnish example
    at which point the last example was scrapped
  • Specifications, maximum speed
    Maximum speed: 155 mph (249 km/h, 135 kn) at 5,000 ft (1,500 m)
  • Specifications, empty weight
    Empty weight: 1,930 lb (875 kg)
  • Lead and development, maker
    The Gloster Gamecock was a biplane fighter designed and produced by the British aircraft manufacturer Gloster.
  • Lead, British aircraft
    designed and produced by the British aircraft manufacturer Gloster
  • In Group: Propeller-Driven Fighters, Lead, aircraft role
    The Gloster Gamecock was a biplane fighter
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.