Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Opel 28/70 PS

Automobiles

The Opel 28/70 PS was a upper-class car that Adam Opel KG built only in 1910 as the successor of the 30/50 PS. It was the most powerful model of the Opel range of its day, stronger than the contemporary 34/65 PS although with a smaller displacement. Its four-cylinder side-valve block engine with a 115 mm bore and 175 mm stroke displaced 7,270 cc and produced 70 PS (51 kW) at 1,600 rpm. Power passed through a leather cone clutch, a manual 4-speed gearbox and a propeller shaft to the rear axle, and the car reached a top speed of 90 km/h. It was offered as a four-seat double phaeton, a four-door Pullman saloon or a landaulet. The double phaeton, the cheapest body, cost 15,000 reichsmarks. Production ended at the end of 1910, and the 29/70 PS followed only from 1914.

Facts
Year
1910 1
Status
Out of production 1
Power (kW)
51 1
Top Speed (km/h)
90 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Source Opel 28/70 PS (German Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Opel 28/70 PS (German Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Opel 28/70 PS (German Wikipedia)Lead
Quote, Lead
Der Opel 28/70 PS war ein PKW der Oberklasse, den die Adam Opel KG nur im Jahre 1910 als Nachfolger des Modells 30/50 PS baute

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Wikipedia: OpelLeadtier 2
Quote, Lead
is a German automobile manufacturer
Sources
1. Opel 28/70 PS (German Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    Der Opel 28/70 PS war ein PKW der Oberklasse, den die Adam Opel KG nur im Jahre 1910 als Nachfolger des Modells 30/50 PS baute
  • Geschichte und Technik, engine
    70 PS (51 kW) bei 1600/min
  • Geschichte und Technik, top speed
    Damit erreichte der Wagen eine Höchstgeschwindigkeit von 90 km/h
View the Source
Wikipedia: Opel
WikipediaLead
Quote, Lead
is a German automobile manufacturer
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.