Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Lancia Loraymo

Automobiles

The Lancia Loraymo was a design study by the industrial designer Raymond Loewy, presented at the 1960 Paris motor show on the basis of the Lancia Flaminia. It used the Flaminia's 2.5 litre V6 engine, tuned by Nardi and Danese with three Weber twin carburettors and a modified camshaft to 150 PS (110 kW) instead of the standard 119 PS. The gold painted car is known for a nose projecting far beyond the headlights with extra lamps on thin struts, a curved rear window with a narrow wing along its top edge, full disc wheel covers and flowing wings in the so-called Coke bottle style. The name combines parts of Raymond Loewy's name. Show visitors disliked the front, so the design was dropped and Loewy drove the one-off car himself for some years before selling it. Lancia recovered it in the 1970s and restored it with a suitable engine, and it now belongs to the vehicle museum of the Fiat group in Turin.

Facts
Year
1960 1
Engine Class
Piston 1
Status
One-off concept 1
Power (kW)
110 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Source Lancia Loraymo (German Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Lancia Loraymo (German Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Lancia Loraymo (German Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturer
Quote, Lead, manufacturer
Der Lancia Loraymo war eine Designstudie des Industriedesigners Raymond Loewy.
Sources
1. Lancia Loraymo (German Wikipedia)
  • Lead
    Das Auto wurde 1960 auf dem Pariser Autosalon präsentiert
  • Lead, engine class
    Auch der 2,5-Liter-V6-Motor stammt aus diesem Modell
  • Lead, status
    Der Lancia Loraymo war eine Designstudie
  • Lead, power
    kam der Wagen auf 150 PS (110 kW), statt original 119 PS (87 kW)
  • Lead, manufacturer
    Der Lancia Loraymo war eine Designstudie des Industriedesigners Raymond Loewy.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.