Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

1989 Jeep Wagoneer (SJ)

Automobiles

The 1989 to 1991 model years are considered the best of the breed because of many improvements. Many improvements were made for the 1989 to 1991 model year series, including a quality replacement for the earlier, leak prone air conditioning compressor, the addition of the visually identifiable rear wiper and washer assembly, and a general improvement in fit and finish. Sales of the Grand Wagoneer were over 10,000 units in 1989.

Facts
Comparison
Body Style
Station Wagon 1
Body Style
SUV or Crossover 1
Year
1989 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Followed By

Model Year Of

Of Make

Preceded By

In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Wikipedia: JeepLead paragraph, Chryslertier 2
Quote, Lead paragraph, Chrysler
Jeep is part of Chrysler, who acquired the Jeep brand, along with other assets, from its previous owner, American Motors Corporation (AMC), in 1987.
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Jeep Wagoneer (SJ)
Wikipedia
  • 1989
    because of many improvements
  • Year: 1989, sales
    Sales of the gas-guzzling Grand Wagoneer plummeted from over 10,000 units in 1989 to 6,449 in 1990.
  • 1989, sales
    Sales of the gas-guzzling Grand Wagoneer plummeted from over 10,000 units in 1989 to 6,449 in 1990.
  • Body style, suv: Lead paragraph
    Designed as a truck-based station wagon, the model line became a progenitor of the modern sport-utility vehicle (SUV).
  • Body style, station-wagon: Lead paragraph
    Alongside the five-door wagon, the Wagoneer was also marketed as a three-door wagon and a two-door panel truck
View the Source
Wikipedia: Jeep
WikipediaLead paragraph, Chrysler
Quote, Lead paragraph, Chrysler
Jeep is part of Chrysler, who acquired the Jeep brand, along with other assets, from its previous owner, American Motors Corporation (AMC), in 1987.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.