The Fliegende Panzerfaust, meaning flying tank fist, was a project for a very-short-range interceptor of the Third Reich designed by Luftschiffbau Zeppelin and proposed to the Emergency Fighter Program against the Allied bombing raids on Germany in the last years of the Second World War. It was a small rocket-powered parasite aircraft with an armoured nose and a V-tail, a wingspan of 4.5 metres and a length of 6 metres, meant to be towed behind a Messerschmitt Bf 109G and released above the enemy bombers. Six Schmidding SG 34 solid-fuel rocket engines would have driven it, and it was to fire two 73-millimetre RZ 65 air-to-air rockets at extremely close range. Its front half, with the pilot lying prone, was to separate from the rear half once the fuel was spent, and both parts were to land by parachute to be reused. A replica is displayed at the Military Aviation Museum in Virginia Beach.
Facts
Engine Class StatusDesign only (never built) 1 Top Speed (km/h) Maximum Mass (kg) Connections
Exemplifies
Source Zeppelin Fliegende Panzerfaust (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Zeppelin Fliegende Panzerfaust (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Zeppelin Fliegende Panzerfaust (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
designed by Luftschiffbau Zeppelin
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Zeppelin Fliegende Panzerfaust (Wikipedia)Lead, country of originQuote, Lead, country of origin
a Third Reich very-short-range interceptor
Sources
1. Zeppelin Fliegende Panzerfaust (Wikipedia)
Lead
was a project for a Third Reich very-short-range interceptor
Description
Powered by six Schmidding SG 34 solid-fuel rocket engines
Specifications
Gross weight: 1,200 kg (2,646 lb)
Specifications, top speed
Maximum speed: 850 km/h (530 mph, 460 kn)
Lead, manufacturer
designed by Luftschiffbau Zeppelin
Lead, country of origin
a Third Reich very-short-range interceptor
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.