Yantar-2K was a Soviet film-return reconnaissance satellite and the first spacecraft of the Yantar series, which supplemented and then replaced the Zenit satellites. It was run by the GRU, the Soviet military intelligence agency, and stayed in orbit about thirty days, far longer than the eight to fourteen days of a Zenit. The craft was built from three conical sections: an equipment module with the propulsion unit, an instrument module, and a special equipment module that carried the Zhemchug-4 camera and returned to Earth at the end of the mission, while two smaller film return capsules came down earlier in the flight. It weighed about 6.6 tonnes. Proposed in 1967, it made a first test launch in May 1974 that ended in a launch failure, entered military service in 1978 under the name Feniks, and flew thirty launches in all before the last on 28 June 1983, after which the similar Yantar-4K1 took its place.
Facts
PropulsionUDMH and dinitrogen tetroxide 1 Connections
Of Make
Source Gunter's Space Page: Yantar-2K (Feniks, 11F624)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Gunter's Space Page: Yantar-2K (Feniks, 11F624)IntroductionQuote, Introduction
These satellites were developed by TsSKB Progress, Samara
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Yantar-2K (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
was a type of Soviet reconnaissance satellite
Sources
1. Yantar-2K (Wikipedia)
Lead
had its first test launch in May 1974
Lead, status
It was in military service from 1978 to 1983
Lead, body style
was a type of Soviet reconnaissance satellite
Equipment
It weighed 6.6 tonnes.
Equipment, propulsion
It used UDMH fuel with an N2O4 oxidiser
View the SourceGunter's Space Page: Yantar-2K (Feniks, 11F624)
Gunter's Space PageOf Make: Progress Rocket Space Centre, IntroductionQuote, Of Make: Progress Rocket Space Centre, Introduction
These satellites were developed by TsSKB Progress, Samara
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.