Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Yakovlev Yak-60

Lighter-Than-Air Craft and Rotorcraft

The Yakovlev Yak-60, known as the Yak-32 in some sources, is the possible designation of an experimental tandem-rotor heavy-lift helicopter design from the late 1960s. It may have competed with the Mil Mi-12 and would have used two Mil Mi-6 rotors in tandem, each driven by a pair of 6,500 hp Soloviev D-25VF engines, potentially giving four times the payload of the Boeing CH-47 Chinook. Its cockpit would have resembled that of the Yak-24. Compared with the radical Mi-12 it was a conventional design, and two Mi-12s were built but no Yak-60s. It never progressed beyond the model stage.

Facts
Engine Class
Turboshaft 1
Status
Design only (never built) 1
Comparison
Body Style
Helicopter 1
Connections

Exemplifies

Aviation, Modes
Source Yakovlev Yak-60 (Wikipedia)

Of Make

Source Yakovlev Yak-60 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Yakovlev Yak-60 (Wikipedia)Lead, maker
Quote, Lead, maker
is the possible designation for an experimental Yakovlev tandem-rotor heavy-lift helicopter design of the late 1960s
Sources
1. Yakovlev Yak-60 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead, body style
    is the possible designation for an experimental Yakovlev tandem-rotor heavy-lift helicopter design of the late 1960s
  • Lead, status
    This design never progressed beyond the model stage
  • Specifications, powerplant
    Soloviev D-25VF turboshaft engines
  • Lead, maker
    is the possible designation for an experimental Yakovlev tandem-rotor heavy-lift helicopter design of the late 1960s
  • In Group: Military Transport and Utility Helicopters, Lead, kind of aircraft
    is the possible designation for an experimental Yakovlev tandem-rotor heavy-lift helicopter design of the late 1960s
  • Exemplifies: Aviation, Lead, mode
    is the possible designation for an experimental Yakovlev tandem-rotor heavy-lift helicopter design of the late 1960s
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.