Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

S&DJR 7F 2-8-0

Steam and Early Locomotives

The Somerset and Dorset Joint Railway 7F 2-8-0 was a class of eleven heavy goods and coal steam locomotives built in two batches, six in 1914 and five in 1925. The Midland Railway, which controlled locomotive policy on the heavily graded line, made a special exception to its small-engine policy, and James Clayton, a draughtsman at Derby, was given a free hand to design an engine unlike any other Derby design of the time. It used the boiler of the Midland Compounds with a Belpaire firebox and Walschaerts valve gear, a leading Bissell truck to spread the weight, and high sloped cylinders to clear platforms. The five locomotives of 1925 were ordered from Robert Stephenson and Company at Darlington and carried larger boilers. All were withdrawn by 1964, and two of the 1925 engines survive in preservation.

Facts
Year
1914 1
Engine Class
Steam 1
Status
Surviving 1
Status
Retired from service 1
Units Built
11 1
Comparison
Body Style
Steam Locomotive 1
Connections

Of Make

Source S&DJR 7F 2-8-0 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source S&DJR 7F 2-8-0 (Wikipedia)Construction
Quote, Construction
In 1925 an additional 5 were ordered from Robert Stephenson and Company in Darlington
Sources
1. S&DJR 7F 2-8-0 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead, units built
    Eleven were built in two batches in 1914 and 1925
  • Lead, body style
    is a class of steam locomotive designed for hauling heavy coal and goods trains
  • Lead, engine class
    is a class of steam locomotive designed for hauling heavy coal and goods trains
  • Later life
    the five 1925-built engines were all withdrawn between 1963 and 1964
  • Preservation
    Two of the 1925-built locomotives have survived
  • Construction
    In 1925 an additional 5 were ordered from Robert Stephenson and Company in Darlington
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.