The Saro A.17 Cutty Sark was a British four-seat amphibian flying boat built by Saunders-Roe in the interwar years and named after the clipper ship. It was a shoulder-winged monoplane with an all-metal hull and plywood-covered wings, and its two engines sat on pylons above the wing, where they could easily be changed on the water. Customers fitted a variety of engines, among them 104 horsepower Cirrus Hermes and 120 horsepower de Havilland Gipsy II units, and a detachable wheeled axle let the boat be beached. It was the first new design to reach quantity production at Saunders-Roe after the 1929 renaming of the firm, and it led directly to the larger A.19 Cloud and the A.21 Windhover. Only twelve were built and none lasted long in service, yet they flew for users in the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, China, Japan and the Dominican Republic.
Facts
Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Saro Cutty Sark (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Saro Cutty Sark (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Saro Cutty Sark (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
The Saro A17 Cutty Sark was a British amphibious aircraft from the period between World War I and World War II, built by the British firm Saunders-Roe (also known as SARO).
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Saro Cutty Sark (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
The Saro A17 Cutty Sark was a British amphibious aircraft from the period between World War I and World War II, built by the British firm Saunders-Roe (also known as SARO).
Sources
1. Saro Cutty Sark (Wikipedia)
Production aircraft
The prototype G-AAIP was first flown on 4 July 1929.
Lead
The Saro A17 Cutty Sark was a British amphibious aircraft from the period between World War I and World War II, built by the British firm Saunders-Roe (also known as SARO).
Lead, units built
Only 12 Cutty Sarks were built, and none lasted long in service
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.