The Messerschmitt P.1099 was a two-seat jet aircraft project that Messerschmitt began designing in the summer of 1943 as an improvement on the Me 262. It was planned so that it could later be developed into a high-speed bomber, reconnaissance aircraft, interceptor, night fighter and trainer. The design was about 12 m long with a 12.6 m wingspan and a wider fuselage than the Me 262, with a cockpit for two at the front and two Junkers Jumo 004 turbojets. The P.1099A fighter of January 1944 kept the Me 262 wings and tail, and the P.1099B was a heavily armed version with a 55 mm MK 112 or a 50 mm MK 114 cannon. None of the variants was built, but the work led to the P.1100 all-weather fighter and then to the single-jet P.1101.
Facts
Engine Class StatusDesign only (never built) 1 Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Messerschmitt P.1099 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Messerschmitt P.1099 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Messerschmitt P.1099 (Wikipedia)Lead, makerQuote, Lead, maker
The Messerschmitt P.1099 was a two-seat prototype jet aircraft developed by Messerschmitt for the Luftwaffe before the end of the Second World War.
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Messerschmitt P.1099 (Wikipedia)Lead, countryQuote, Lead, country
developed by Messerschmitt for the Luftwaffe before the end of the Second World War
Sources
1. Messerschmitt P.1099 (Wikipedia)
Lead
two-seat prototype jet aircraft
History
The design of the Me P.1099 began in the summer of 1943
History, status
None of the variants was built
History, engine class
The planned powerplants were two Junkers Jumo 004 turbojet engines
Lead, maker
The Messerschmitt P.1099 was a two-seat prototype jet aircraft developed by Messerschmitt for the Luftwaffe before the end of the Second World War.
Lead, country
developed by Messerschmitt for the Luftwaffe before the end of the Second World War
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.