The Messerschmitt M 28 was a mail plane developed in Germany in the early 1930s to meet a requirement of Deutsche Luft Hansa. It was a single-engine low-wing cantilever monoplane of conventional design with an enclosed cockpit and a fixed tailskid undercarriage. Despite successful trials Luft Hansa changed its requirement and did not buy it, possibly in part because of the enmity of its director Erhard Milch towards Messerschmitt. It was Messerschmitt's last attempt to sell a commercial aircraft in Germany, after which the company returned to sport aircraft. The specification gives a 390 kW BMW-built Pratt and Whitney Hornet engine and a maximum speed of 260 km/h.
Facts
Top Speed (km/h) Comparison
Body StyleAircraft (no road body style) 1 Connections
Exemplifies
Source Messerschmitt M 28 (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source Messerschmitt M 28 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source Messerschmitt M 28 (Wikipedia)Lead, makerQuote, Lead, maker
The Messerschmitt M 28 was a mail plane developed in Germany in the early 1930s
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source Messerschmitt M 28 (Wikipedia)Lead, countryQuote, Lead, country
was a mail plane developed in Germany in the early 1930s
Sources
1. Messerschmitt M 28 (Wikipedia)
Lead, country
was a mail plane developed in Germany in the early 1930s
Specifications
Empty weight: 1,480 kg (3,260 lb)
Specifications, top speed
Maximum speed: 260 km/h (160 mph, 140 kn)
Lead, maker
The Messerschmitt M 28 was a mail plane developed in Germany in the early 1930s
Of Make: Messerschmitt, Lead
The Messerschmitt M 28 was a mail plane developed in Germany in the early 1930s
Exemplifies: Aviation, Lead
The Messerschmitt M 28 was a mail plane developed in Germany in the early 1930s
In Group: Early Commercial Airliners and Transports, Lead, mail plane
The Messerschmitt M 28 was a mail plane developed in Germany in the early 1930s
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.