Transport Atlas

How The World Moves
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Vehicle

Martin Marietta Spacemaster

Spacecraft and Launch Vehicles

The Martin Marietta Spacemaster was a proposed design for what became the Space Shuttle, put forward by Martin Marietta and evaluated in 1967 before it was rejected. It combined an orbiter derived from the company X-24 lifting body with an unusual catamaran style booster of two parallel halves. During launch and ascent the orbiter would sit in a recess between them, and the booster would carry 14 engines in two clusters of seven at the bottom of the halves. Unlike the final Space Shuttle there would have been no external tank, and connecting struts would join the two booster halves and hold the orbiter. Martin Marietta went on to build the Space Shuttle external tank instead, and a model of the Spacemaster is held by the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum.

Facts
Year
1967 1
Propulsion
Liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen 1
Engine Class
Rocket 1
Status
Design only (never built) 1
Comparison
Body Style
Launch vehicle 1
In the Other Atlases

Manufactured By

Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.

Source Martin Marietta Spacemaster (Wikipedia)Lead
Quote, Lead
The Martin Marietta Spacemaster was a proposed configuration for what became the Space Shuttle

Originated In

Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.

Source Encyclopedia Astronautica: SpacemasterLead
Quote, Lead
American winged orbital launch vehicle.
Sources
1. Encyclopedia Astronautica: Spacemaster
Encyclopedia Astronautica
  • Stage data, status
    Status: Study 1967.
  • Stage data, study status
    Status: Study 1967.
  • Lead
    American winged orbital launch vehicle.
  • Stage data, propellants
    Propellants: Lox/LH2.
  • Stage data, engines
    Propellants: Lox/LH2. No Engines: 14. Engine: SSME Study.
View the Source
Martin Marietta Spacemaster (Wikipedia)
Lead
Quote, Lead
The Martin Marietta Spacemaster was a proposed configuration for what became the Space Shuttle
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.