The M113 is a fully tracked armored personnel carrier developed and built by the FMC Corporation and adopted by the United States Army in 1960. It was the first aluminium hulled combat vehicle to go into mass production, light enough to be carried by air and moderately amphibious while still stopping small arms fire. Early vehicles used a gasoline engine, and a diesel version, the M113A1, soon replaced it. The carrier saw heavy use in the Vietnam War, where crews fitted gun shields after early losses, and its hull became the basis of a very large family of ambulances, mortar carriers, command posts and engineer vehicles. Production ended in 2007 after an estimated eighty thousand vehicles in the family, used by more than fifty countries.
Facts
Comparison
Body StyleArmoured Personnel Carrier 1 Connections
Of Make
Source M113 armored personnel carrier (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Same As
Also in War and Military Atlas: the same subject.
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source M113 armored personnel carrier (Wikipedia)Lead, manufacturerQuote, Lead, manufacturer
developed and produced by the FMC Corporation
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source M113 armored personnel carrier (Wikipedia)Development, country of originQuote, Development, country of origin
was adopted by the U.S. Army in 1960
Sources
1. M113 armored personnel carrier (Wikipedia)
Development
Entering service with the U.S. Army in 1960
Lead
The M113 is a fully tracked armored personnel carrier (APC)
Lead, status
M113 production was terminated in 2007.
Lead, units built
over 80,000 vehicles in the M113 family have been produced
Development, early engine
quickly supplanted the gasoline-engined M113
Development, diesel version
A diesel prototype, T113E2, was put into production in 1964
Lead, manufacturer
developed and produced by the FMC Corporation
Development, country of origin
was adopted by the U.S. Army in 1960
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.