The LCDR Brigand class was a pair of steam locomotives of the 0-4-2 wheel arrangement supplied to the London, Chatham and Dover Railway. Patrick Stirling designed them for the Glasgow and South Western Railway, which ordered twenty from Sharp, Stewart and Company in 1860. The Dover railway needed engines quickly and had little money, so its locomotive superintendent William Martley arranged for two of those ordered to be delivered to it instead, arriving in August 1861, with two more ordered for the Glasgow company as replacements. Numbered 1 and 2 in 1875, they were rebuilt in 1884 and 1890, passed to the South Eastern and Chatham Railway in 1899, and were withdrawn in May 1903. Their names came from the first two Great Western Railway Bogie Class engines.
Facts
Engine Class Connections
Exemplifies
Source LCDR Brigand class (Wikipedia)
Of Make
Source LCDR Brigand class (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Manufactured By
Also in Business Atlas: the manufacturer of this subject.
Source LCDR Brigand class (Wikipedia)LeadQuote, Lead
which ordered twenty in 1860 from Sharp, Stewart & Co.
Originated In
Also in Geography Atlas: where this subject originated.
Source LCDR Brigand class (Wikipedia)Lead, country of originQuote, Lead, country of origin
supplied to the London, Chatham and Dover Railway (LCDR)
Sources
1. LCDR Brigand class (Wikipedia)
Lead, body style
was a pair of steam locomotives of the 0-4-2 wheel arrangement
Lead, engine
was a pair of steam locomotives of the 0-4-2 wheel arrangement
Lead, propulsion
was a pair of steam locomotives of the 0-4-2 wheel arrangement
Lead, delivery
they arrived in August 1861
Lead, units
was a pair of steam locomotives of the 0-4-2 wheel arrangement
Numbering, withdrawal
Both were withdrawn from service in May 1903.
Lead
which ordered twenty in 1860 from Sharp, Stewart & Co.
Lead, country of origin
supplied to the London, Chatham and Dover Railway (LCDR)
Exemplifies: Rail Transport, Lead, railway
which ordered twenty in 1860 from Sharp, Stewart & Co.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.